Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,996,154 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.103% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 102.9 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.2%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $49,412, a difference of 7.9%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $60,388, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $64,952, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $41,373, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $92,029, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.91%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.6%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.11%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.6%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.2%).