Zimbabwean vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,358,491 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.151% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 151.4 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $65,236, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $113,701, a difference of 15.3%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $103,145, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,800, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $71,139, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.8%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.76%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.5%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.5%).