Immigrants from Singapore vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,286,849 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Singapore communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.795. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Singapore within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.441% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Singapore corresponds to an increase of 1,440.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($58,353 compared to $46,098, a difference of 26.6%), median male earnings ($71,348 compared to $56,872, a difference of 25.5%), and median earnings ($59,038 compared to $48,836, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,835 compared to $58,162, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($72,963 compared to $77,465, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,514 compared to $116,156, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.96%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 18.0%), divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and family households (63.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 108.6%), professional degree (7.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 73.5%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.32%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 38.9%), ambulatory disability (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and male disability (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.3%).