Vision Disability by Race, Ethnicity and Immigration Origin

SELECT DEMOGRAPHIC

Select Demographic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Vision Disability
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Common Questions

What are the top races in the United States with the lowest percentage of population with vision disability?
The top races in the United States with the lowest percentage of population with vision disability are:
#1
Asians
1.9%
(100.0/100)
#2
Hawaiians
2.3%
(2.9/100)
#3
Whites/Caucasians
2.4%
(0.2/100)
What are the top ancestries in the United States with the lowest percentage of population with vision disability?
The top ancestries in the United States with the lowest percentage of population with vision disability are:
#1
Filipinos
1.7%
(100.0/100)
#2
Thais
1.7%
(100.0/100)
#3
Okinawans
1.8%
(100.0/100)
#4
Iranians
1.8%
(100.0/100)
#5
Indians (Asian)
1.8%
(100.0/100)
What are the top immigration origins in the United States with the lowest percentage of population with vision disability?
The top immigration origins in the United States with the lowest percentage of population with vision disability are:
#1
Immigrants from India
1.7%
(100.0/100)
#2
Immigrants from Taiwan
1.7%
(100.0/100)
#3
Immigrants from Iran
1.8%
(100.0/100)
#4
Immigrants from South Central Asia
1.8%
(100.0/100)
#5
Immigrants from Singapore
1.8%
(100.0/100)

Top 10 Demographics by Vision Disability

The best off demographics with the lowest percentage of population with vision disability in the United States are Immigrants from India (1.7%, 100.0/100), Filipino (1.7%, 100.0/100), Immigrants from Taiwan (1.7%, 100.0/100), Thai (1.7%, 100.0/100), and Okinawan (1.8%, 100.0/100).
Top 10 Demographics by Vision Disability

Bottom 10 Demographics by Vision Disability

The worst off demographics with the highest percentage of population with vision disability in the United States are Puerto Rican (3.9%, 0.0/100), Houma (3.4%, 0.0/100), Lumbee (3.4%, 0.0/100), Pueblo (3.3%, 0.0/100), and Pima (3.3%, 0.0/100).
Bottom 10 Demographics by Vision Disability

Vision Disability by Race

Top demographics by Vision Disability within the race category in the United States are Asians (1.9%, 100.0/100), Hawaiians (2.3%, 2.9/100), and Whites/Caucasians (2.4%, 0.2/100).
Vision Disability by Race
RaceRating | RankVision Disability
Asian
100.0
/100
|
#20
Exceptional
1.9%
Black/African American
0.0
/100
|
#320
Tragic
2.8%
Hawaiian
2.9
/100
|
#227
Tragic
2.3%
Hispanic or Latino
0.0
/100
|
#305
Tragic
2.6%
Native/Alaskan
0.0
/100
|
#327
Tragic
3.0%
White/Caucasian
0.2
/100
|
#259
Tragic
2.4%

Vision Disability by Ancestry

Top 20 Ancestries by Vision Disability

Top demographics by Vision Disability within the ancestry category in the United States are Filipinos (1.7%, 100.0/100), Thais (1.7%, 100.0/100), Okinawans (1.8%, 100.0/100), Iranians (1.8%, 100.0/100), and Indians (Asian) (1.8%, 100.0/100).
Vision Disability by Ancestry
AncestryRating | RankVision Disability
Afghan
99.5
/100
|
#50
Exceptional
2.0%
African
0.0
/100
|
#300
Tragic
2.5%
Alaska Native
0.0
/100
|
#318
Tragic
2.7%
Alaskan Athabascan
0.0
/100
|
#336
Tragic
3.1%
Albanian
94.9
/100
|
#101
Exceptional
2.1%
Aleut
0.0
/100
|
#304
Tragic
2.6%
Alsatian
0.6
/100
|
#245
Tragic
2.3%
American
0.0
/100
|
#312
Tragic
2.6%
Apache
0.0
/100
|
#329
Tragic
3.0%
Arab
86.3
/100
|
#138
Excellent
2.1%
Arapaho
0.0
/100
|
#308
Tragic
2.6%
Argentinean
99.1
/100
|
#59
Exceptional
2.0%
Armenian
99.0
/100
|
#63
Exceptional
2.0%
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
98.1
/100
|
#79
Exceptional
2.0%
Australian
95.9
/100
|
#95
Exceptional
2.1%
Austrian
69.0
/100
|
#160
Good
2.1%
Bahamian
0.0
/100
|
#277
Tragic
2.4%
Bangladeshi
0.5
/100
|
#250
Tragic
2.3%
Barbadian
5.1
/100
|
#217
Tragic
2.3%
Basque
3.5
/100
|
#223
Tragic
2.3%
Belgian
75.9
/100
|
#150
Good
2.1%
Belizean
0.2
/100
|
#260
Tragic
2.4%
Bermudan
9.0
/100
|
#212
Tragic
2.2%
Bhutanese
99.8
/100
|
#37
Exceptional
2.0%
Blackfeet
0.0
/100
|
#310
Tragic
2.6%
Bolivian
100.0
/100
|
#18
Exceptional
1.9%
Brazilian
62.2
/100
|
#168
Good
2.1%
British
25.1
/100
|
#193
Fair
2.2%
British West Indian
0.2
/100
|
#258
Tragic
2.4%
Bulgarian
99.9
/100
|
#25
Exceptional
1.9%
Burmese
100.0
/100
|
#17
Exceptional
1.8%
Cajun
0.0
/100
|
#333
Tragic
3.1%
Cambodian
99.8
/100
|
#36
Exceptional
2.0%
Canadian
25.8
/100
|
#191
Fair
2.2%
Cape Verdean
0.0
/100
|
#280
Tragic
2.4%
Carpatho Rusyn
94.3
/100
|
#105
Exceptional
2.1%
Celtic
0.1
/100
|
#269
Tragic
2.4%
Central American
1.8
/100
|
#233
Tragic
2.3%
Central American Indian
0.0
/100
|
#331
Tragic
3.0%
Cherokee
0.0
/100
|
#325
Tragic
2.9%
Cheyenne
0.0
/100
|
#334
Tragic
3.1%
Chickasaw
0.0
/100
|
#338
Tragic
3.2%
Chilean
94.0
/100
|
#109
Exceptional
2.1%
Chinese
97.2
/100
|
#85
Exceptional
2.0%
Chippewa
0.0
/100
|
#275
Tragic
2.4%
Choctaw
0.0
/100
|
#342
Tragic
3.3%
Colombian
76.2
/100
|
#149
Good
2.1%
Colville
0.0
/100
|
#330
Tragic
3.0%
Comanche
0.0
/100
|
#321
Tragic
2.8%
Costa Rican
40.7
/100
|
#182
Average
2.2%
Cree
0.0
/100
|
#299
Tragic
2.5%
Creek
0.0
/100
|
#340
Tragic
3.2%
Croatian
92.3
/100
|
#114
Exceptional
2.1%
Crow
0.0
/100
|
#292
Tragic
2.5%
Cuban
0.1
/100
|
#270
Tragic
2.4%
Cypriot
99.7
/100
|
#41
Exceptional
2.0%
Czech
86.3
/100
|
#136
Excellent
2.1%
Czechoslovakian
21.6
/100
|
#198
Fair
2.2%
Danish
94.2
/100
|
#107
Exceptional
2.1%
Delaware
0.0
/100
|
#295
Tragic
2.5%
Dominican
0.0
/100
|
#311
Tragic
2.6%
Dutch
17.1
/100
|
#203
Poor
2.2%
Dutch West Indian
0.0
/100
|
#337
Tragic
3.2%
Eastern European
99.7
/100
|
#43
Exceptional
2.0%
Ecuadorian
4.6
/100
|
#219
Tragic
2.3%
Egyptian
99.9
/100
|
#29
Exceptional
1.9%
English
1.1
/100
|
#239
Tragic
2.3%
Estonian
95.3
/100
|
#99
Exceptional
2.1%
Ethiopian
99.7
/100
|
#45
Exceptional
2.0%
European
25.7
/100
|
#192
Fair
2.2%
Fijian
0.1
/100
|
#261
Tragic
2.4%
Filipino
100.0
/100
|
#2
Exceptional
1.7%
Finnish
78.3
/100
|
#148
Good
2.1%
French
0.5
/100
|
#246
Tragic
2.3%
French American Indian
0.0
/100
|
#288
Tragic
2.5%
French Canadian
3.9
/100
|
#221
Tragic
2.3%
German
13.4
/100
|
#208
Poor
2.2%
German Russian
1.8
/100
|
#232
Tragic
2.3%
Ghanaian
21.8
/100
|
#197
Fair
2.2%
Greek
95.1
/100
|
#100
Exceptional
2.1%
Guamanian/Chamorro
3.9
/100
|
#220
Tragic
2.3%
Guatemalan
0.5
/100
|
#247
Tragic
2.3%
Guyanese
28.9
/100
|
#188
Fair
2.2%
Haitian
0.3
/100
|
#254
Tragic
2.4%
Hmong
2.5
/100
|
#228
Tragic
2.3%
Honduran
0.0
/100
|
#287
Tragic
2.5%
Hopi
0.0
/100
|
#324
Tragic
2.9%
Houma
0.0
/100
|
#346
Tragic
3.4%
Hungarian
67.4
/100
|
#162
Good
2.1%
Icelander
66.1
/100
|
#163
Good
2.1%
Indian (Asian)
100.0
/100
|
#16
Exceptional
1.8%
Indonesian
9.5
/100
|
#211
Tragic
2.2%
Inupiat
0.0
/100
|
#314
Tragic
2.7%
Iranian
100.0
/100
|
#8
Exceptional
1.8%
Iraqi
67.7
/100
|
#161
Good
2.1%
Irish
3.4
/100
|
#224
Tragic
2.3%
Iroquois
0.0
/100
|
#306
Tragic
2.6%
Israeli
99.6
/100
|
#48
Exceptional
2.0%
Italian
79.7
/100
|
#146
Good
2.1%
Jamaican
0.1
/100
|
#262
Tragic
2.4%
Japanese
0.3
/100
|
#253
Tragic
2.4%
Jordanian
99.2
/100
|
#56
Exceptional
2.0%
Kenyan
92.5
/100
|
#113
Exceptional
2.1%
Kiowa
0.0
/100
|
#341
Tragic
3.3%
Korean
94.1
/100
|
#108
Exceptional
2.1%
Laotian
99.3
/100
|
#55
Exceptional
2.0%
Latvian
99.5
/100
|
#49
Exceptional
2.0%
Lebanese
54.3
/100
|
#171
Average
2.2%
Liberian
0.5
/100
|
#249
Tragic
2.3%
Lithuanian
97.7
/100
|
#80
Exceptional
2.0%
Lumbee
0.0
/100
|
#345
Tragic
3.4%
Luxembourger
99.9
/100
|
#32
Exceptional
1.9%
Macedonian
99.3
/100
|
#54
Exceptional
2.0%
Malaysian
0.9
/100
|
#241
Tragic
2.3%
Maltese
98.9
/100
|
#65
Exceptional
2.0%
Marshallese
1.5
/100
|
#235
Tragic
2.3%
Menominee
0.0
/100
|
#301
Tragic
2.5%
Mexican
0.0
/100
|
#298
Tragic
2.5%
Mexican American Indian
0.1
/100
|
#266
Tragic
2.4%
Mongolian
99.9
/100
|
#31
Exceptional
1.9%
Moroccan
35.4
/100
|
#184
Fair
2.2%
Native Hawaiian
33.3
/100
|
#186
Fair
2.2%
Navajo
0.0
/100
|
#335
Tragic
3.1%
Nepalese
0.0
/100
|
#279
Tragic
2.4%
New Zealander
88.2
/100
|
#132
Excellent
2.1%
Nicaraguan
2.2
/100
|
#230
Tragic
2.3%
Nigerian
7.2
/100
|
#215
Tragic
2.3%
Northern European
50.1
/100
|
#172
Average
2.2%
Norwegian
97.0
/100
|
#88
Exceptional
2.0%
Okinawan
100.0
/100
|
#5
Exceptional
1.8%
Osage
0.0
/100
|
#315
Tragic
2.7%
Ottawa
0.0
/100
|
#294
Tragic
2.5%
Paiute
0.0
/100
|
#322
Tragic
2.9%
Pakistani
71.6
/100
|
#156
Good
2.1%
Palestinian
98.3
/100
|
#74
Exceptional
2.0%
Panamanian
0.9
/100
|
#240
Tragic
2.3%
Paraguayan
98.3
/100
|
#76
Exceptional
2.0%
Pennsylvania German
14.5
/100
|
#206
Poor
2.2%
Peruvian
93.5
/100
|
#111
Exceptional
2.1%
Pima
0.0
/100
|
#343
Tragic
3.3%
Polish
92.0
/100
|
#117
Exceptional
2.1%
Portuguese
4.9
/100
|
#218
Tragic
2.3%
Potawatomi
0.0
/100
|
#313
Tragic
2.6%
Pueblo
0.0
/100
|
#344
Tragic
3.3%
Puerto Rican
0.0
/100
|
#347
Tragic
3.9%
Puget Sound Salish
0.0
/100
|
#283
Tragic
2.5%
Romanian
95.7
/100
|
#96
Exceptional
2.1%
Russian
98.6
/100
|
#69
Exceptional
2.0%
Salvadoran
27.4
/100
|
#189
Fair
2.2%
Samoan
15.7
/100
|
#205
Poor
2.2%
Scandinavian
50.0
/100
|
#173
Average
2.2%
Scotch-Irish
0.0
/100
|
#276
Tragic
2.4%
Scottish
1.6
/100
|
#234
Tragic
2.3%
Seminole
0.0
/100
|
#332
Tragic
3.1%
Senegalese
0.1
/100
|
#268
Tragic
2.4%
Serbian
70.2
/100
|
#157
Good
2.1%
Shoshone
0.0
/100
|
#316
Tragic
2.7%
Sierra Leonean
84.1
/100
|
#141
Excellent
2.1%
Sioux
0.0
/100
|
#286
Tragic
2.5%
Slavic
46.0
/100
|
#177
Average
2.2%
Slovak
18.8
/100
|
#201
Poor
2.2%
Slovene
73.6
/100
|
#154
Good
2.1%
Somali
99.2
/100
|
#57
Exceptional
2.0%
South African
69.8
/100
|
#159
Good
2.1%
South American
82.8
/100
|
#142
Excellent
2.1%
South American Indian
57.4
/100
|
#169
Average
2.2%
Soviet Union
97.6
/100
|
#81
Exceptional
2.0%
Spaniard
0.1
/100
|
#272
Tragic
2.4%
Spanish
0.0
/100
|
#278
Tragic
2.4%
Spanish American
0.0
/100
|
#326
Tragic
2.9%
Spanish American Indian
0.0
/100
|
#302
Tragic
2.6%
Sri Lankan
94.8
/100
|
#102
Exceptional
2.1%
Subsaharan African
0.5
/100
|
#248
Tragic
2.3%
Sudanese
89.2
/100
|
#127
Excellent
2.1%
Swedish
94.2
/100
|
#106
Exceptional
2.1%
Swiss
55.7
/100
|
#170
Average
2.2%
Syrian
87.5
/100
|
#133
Excellent
2.1%
Taiwanese
99.9
/100
|
#27
Exceptional
1.9%
Thai
100.0
/100
|
#4
Exceptional
1.7%
Tlingit-Haida
0.0
/100
|
#323
Tragic
2.9%
Tohono O'Odham
0.0
/100
|
#319
Tragic
2.8%
Tongan
99.5
/100
|
#51
Exceptional
2.0%
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
8.2
/100
|
#214
Tragic
2.2%
Tsimshian
0.0
/100
|
#339
Tragic
3.2%
Turkish
100.0
/100
|
#21
Exceptional
1.9%
U.S. Virgin Islander
0.0
/100
|
#281
Tragic
2.5%
Ugandan
92.2
/100
|
#116
Exceptional
2.1%
Ukrainian
81.9
/100
|
#144
Excellent
2.1%
Uruguayan
42.7
/100
|
#180
Average
2.2%
Ute
0.1
/100
|
#267
Tragic
2.4%
Venezuelan
87.2
/100
|
#134
Excellent
2.1%
Vietnamese
86.7
/100
|
#135
Excellent
2.1%
Welsh
2.3
/100
|
#229
Tragic
2.3%
West Indian
0.2
/100
|
#257
Tragic
2.4%
Yakama
0.0
/100
|
#284
Tragic
2.5%
Yaqui
0.0
/100
|
#293
Tragic
2.5%
Yugoslavian
46.5
/100
|
#176
Average
2.2%
Yuman
0.0
/100
|
#328
Tragic
3.0%
Yup'ik
0.0
/100
|
#317
Tragic
2.7%
Zimbabwean
99.7
/100
|
#39
Exceptional
2.0%

Vision Disability by Immigration

Top 20 Immigration Origins by Vision Disability

Top demographics by Vision Disability within the immigration category in the United States are Immigrants from India (1.7%, 100.0/100), Immigrants from Taiwan (1.7%, 100.0/100), Immigrants from Iran (1.8%, 100.0/100), Immigrants from South Central Asia (1.8%, 100.0/100), and Immigrants from Singapore (1.8%, 100.0/100).
Vision Disability by Immigration
ImmigrationRating | RankVision Disability
Nonimmigrants
0.0
/100
|
#289
Tragic
2.5%
Immigrants
23.7
/100
|
#195
Fair
2.2%
Afghanistan
95.6
/100
|
#97
Exceptional
2.1%
Africa
62.6
/100
|
#167
Good
2.1%
Albania
90.4
/100
|
#123
Exceptional
2.1%
Argentina
98.9
/100
|
#66
Exceptional
2.0%
Armenia
93.8
/100
|
#110
Exceptional
2.1%
Asia
99.9
/100
|
#23
Exceptional
1.9%
Australia
99.8
/100
|
#35
Exceptional
1.9%
Austria
94.4
/100
|
#103
Exceptional
2.1%
Bahamas
0.1
/100
|
#273
Tragic
2.4%
Bangladesh
65.5
/100
|
#164
Good
2.1%
Barbados
24.0
/100
|
#194
Fair
2.2%
Belarus
99.3
/100
|
#53
Exceptional
2.0%
Belgium
99.1
/100
|
#61
Exceptional
2.0%
Belize
0.1
/100
|
#263
Tragic
2.4%
Bolivia
100.0
/100
|
#15
Exceptional
1.8%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
81.5
/100
|
#145
Excellent
2.1%
Brazil
13.1
/100
|
#209
Poor
2.2%
Bulgaria
99.7
/100
|
#47
Exceptional
2.0%
Burma/Myanmar
37.9
/100
|
#183
Fair
2.2%
Cabo Verde
0.0
/100
|
#303
Tragic
2.6%
Cambodia
1.1
/100
|
#238
Tragic
2.3%
Cameroon
88.8
/100
|
#129
Excellent
2.1%
Canada
50.0
/100
|
#174
Average
2.2%
Caribbean
0.0
/100
|
#282
Tragic
2.5%
Central America
0.0
/100
|
#285
Tragic
2.5%
Chile
89.0
/100
|
#128
Excellent
2.1%
China
100.0
/100
|
#14
Exceptional
1.8%
Colombia
72.1
/100
|
#155
Good
2.1%
Congo
1.4
/100
|
#236
Tragic
2.3%
Costa Rica
26.1
/100
|
#190
Fair
2.2%
Croatia
96.0
/100
|
#94
Exceptional
2.1%
Cuba
0.0
/100
|
#290
Tragic
2.5%
Czechoslovakia
98.7
/100
|
#68
Exceptional
2.0%
Denmark
92.9
/100
|
#112
Exceptional
2.1%
Dominica
0.0
/100
|
#297
Tragic
2.5%
Dominican Republic
0.0
/100
|
#307
Tragic
2.6%
Eastern Africa
97.0
/100
|
#89
Exceptional
2.0%
Eastern Asia
100.0
/100
|
#13
Exceptional
1.8%
Eastern Europe
98.3
/100
|
#78
Exceptional
2.0%
Ecuador
2.0
/100
|
#231
Tragic
2.3%
Egypt
99.9
/100
|
#33
Exceptional
1.9%
El Salvador
21.0
/100
|
#199
Fair
2.2%
England
62.8
/100
|
#166
Good
2.1%
Eritrea
98.4
/100
|
#73
Exceptional
2.0%
Ethiopia
99.7
/100
|
#42
Exceptional
2.0%
Europe
96.1
/100
|
#93
Exceptional
2.1%
Fiji
47.6
/100
|
#175
Average
2.2%
France
98.5
/100
|
#72
Exceptional
2.0%
Germany
3.0
/100
|
#226
Tragic
2.3%
Ghana
8.9
/100
|
#213
Tragic
2.2%
Greece
99.0
/100
|
#64
Exceptional
2.0%
Grenada
23.1
/100
|
#196
Fair
2.2%
Guatemala
0.3
/100
|
#255
Tragic
2.4%
Guyana
15.9
/100
|
#204
Poor
2.2%
Haiti
0.2
/100
|
#256
Tragic
2.4%
Honduras
0.0
/100
|
#291
Tragic
2.5%
Hong Kong
100.0
/100
|
#10
Exceptional
1.8%
Hungary
88.7
/100
|
#131
Excellent
2.1%
India
100.0
/100
|
#1
Exceptional
1.7%
Indonesia
99.7
/100
|
#44
Exceptional
2.0%
Iran
100.0
/100
|
#6
Exceptional
1.8%
Iraq
64.8
/100
|
#165
Good
2.1%
Ireland
99.7
/100
|
#40
Exceptional
2.0%
Israel
100.0
/100
|
#11
Exceptional
1.8%
Italy
94.4
/100
|
#104
Exceptional
2.1%
Jamaica
0.1
/100
|
#265
Tragic
2.4%
Japan
99.9
/100
|
#26
Exceptional
1.9%
Jordan
98.3
/100
|
#77
Exceptional
2.0%
Kazakhstan
98.6
/100
|
#70
Exceptional
2.0%
Kenya
88.7
/100
|
#130
Excellent
2.1%
Korea
100.0
/100
|
#12
Exceptional
1.8%
Kuwait
99.8
/100
|
#38
Exceptional
2.0%
Laos
0.4
/100
|
#251
Tragic
2.4%
Latin America
0.0
/100
|
#274
Tragic
2.4%
Latvia
97.3
/100
|
#84
Exceptional
2.0%
Lebanon
96.7
/100
|
#90
Exceptional
2.1%
Liberia
0.1
/100
|
#264
Tragic
2.4%
Lithuania
99.9
/100
|
#24
Exceptional
1.9%
Malaysia
99.9
/100
|
#28
Exceptional
1.9%
Mexico
0.0
/100
|
#296
Tragic
2.5%
Micronesia
0.3
/100
|
#252
Tragic
2.4%
Middle Africa
33.5
/100
|
#185
Fair
2.2%
Moldova
97.2
/100
|
#86
Exceptional
2.0%
Morocco
85.2
/100
|
#139
Excellent
2.1%
Nepal
99.9
/100
|
#30
Exceptional
1.9%
Netherlands
84.2
/100
|
#140
Excellent
2.1%
Nicaragua
0.6
/100
|
#243
Tragic
2.3%
Nigeria
13.5
/100
|
#207
Poor
2.2%
North America
44.5
/100
|
#179
Average
2.2%
North Macedonia
98.3
/100
|
#75
Exceptional
2.0%
Northern Africa
98.8
/100
|
#67
Exceptional
2.0%
Northern Europe
98.6
/100
|
#71
Exceptional
2.0%
Norway
75.5
/100
|
#151
Good
2.1%
Oceania
45.1
/100
|
#178
Average
2.2%
Pakistan
100.0
/100
|
#22
Exceptional
1.9%
Panama
0.8
/100
|
#242
Tragic
2.3%
Peru
89.5
/100
|
#126
Excellent
2.1%
Philippines
91.4
/100
|
#118
Exceptional
2.1%
Poland
97.6
/100
|
#82
Exceptional
2.0%
Portugal
1.4
/100
|
#237
Tragic
2.3%
Romania
99.1
/100
|
#60
Exceptional
2.0%
Russia
99.1
/100
|
#62
Exceptional
2.0%
Saudi Arabia
99.2
/100
|
#58
Exceptional
2.0%
Scotland
90.4
/100
|
#121
Exceptional
2.1%
Senegal
3.8
/100
|
#222
Tragic
2.3%
Serbia
99.4
/100
|
#52
Exceptional
2.0%
Sierra Leone
82.8
/100
|
#143
Excellent
2.1%
Singapore
100.0
/100
|
#9
Exceptional
1.8%
Somalia
96.2
/100
|
#91
Exceptional
2.1%
South Africa
95.4
/100
|
#98
Exceptional
2.1%
South America
73.8
/100
|
#153
Good
2.1%
South Central Asia
100.0
/100
|
#7
Exceptional
1.8%
South Eastern Asia
86.3
/100
|
#137
Excellent
2.1%
Southern Europe
74.6
/100
|
#152
Good
2.1%
Spain
89.8
/100
|
#124
Excellent
2.1%
Sri Lanka
100.0
/100
|
#19
Exceptional
1.9%
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
30.3
/100
|
#187
Fair
2.2%
Sudan
78.4
/100
|
#147
Good
2.1%
Sweden
99.7
/100
|
#46
Exceptional
2.0%
Switzerland
97.0
/100
|
#87
Exceptional
2.0%
Syria
96.2
/100
|
#92
Exceptional
2.1%
Taiwan
100.0
/100
|
#3
Exceptional
1.7%
Thailand
20.1
/100
|
#200
Fair
2.2%
Trinidad and Tobago
6.1
/100
|
#216
Tragic
2.3%
Turkey
99.8
/100
|
#34
Exceptional
1.9%
Uganda
91.4
/100
|
#119
Exceptional
2.1%
Ukraine
90.4
/100
|
#122
Exceptional
2.1%
Uruguay
11.5
/100
|
#210
Poor
2.2%
Uzbekistan
69.9
/100
|
#158
Good
2.1%
Venezuela
89.8
/100
|
#125
Excellent
2.1%
Vietnam
92.2
/100
|
#115
Exceptional
2.1%
West Indies
0.6
/100
|
#244
Tragic
2.3%
Western Africa
3.4
/100
|
#225
Tragic
2.3%
Western Asia
97.5
/100
|
#83
Exceptional
2.0%
Western Europe
41.1
/100
|
#181
Average
2.2%
Yemen
0.0
/100
|
#309
Tragic
2.6%
Zaire
18.0
/100
|
#202
Poor
2.2%
Zimbabwe
91.0
/100
|
#120
Exceptional
2.1%
Azores
0.1
/100
|
#271
Tragic
2.4%