Yuman vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,213,560 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Yuman communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yuman within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yuman corresponds to an increase of 35.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yuman and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,055 compared to $116,188, a difference of 48.9%), householder income over 65 years ($53,110 compared to $77,465, a difference of 45.9%), and median household income ($68,743 compared to $98,496, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,933 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($35,377 compared to $41,461, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yuman and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 167.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (30.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 158.2%), and family poverty (16.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 155.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 48.3%), single mother poverty (37.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 53.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 56.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yuman and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (16.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 293.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (9.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 139.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (37.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 133.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 38.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yuman and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 39.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (71.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yuman and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 86.6%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.1%), and births to unmarried women (44.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.47 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 80.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yuman and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 68.7%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 57.8%), and bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.68%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (10.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 67.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 53.5%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age over 75 (54.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.7%).