Immigrants from Laos vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Chinese
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,730,448 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 81.8 Chinese.
Immigrants from Laos vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $77,465, a difference of 36.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.8%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $116,188, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 8.7%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $41,461, a difference of 12.5%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $48,836, a difference of 13.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 57.3%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 56.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.3%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 24.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chinese |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.96%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.0%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.090%), family households (65.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 9.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 113.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.5%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.98%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |