Zimbabwean vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,736,546 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.212% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 212.2 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $97,958, a difference of 12.3%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $41,495, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,934, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,376, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,333, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 22.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.94%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.54%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 89.0%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 68.8%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 39.0%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.8%).