Cajun vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cajun
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cajuns
Chinese
2,029
SOCIAL INDEX
17.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
275th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Cajun Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,198,683 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.439. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to a decrease of 31.1 Chinese.
Cajun vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,397 compared to $77,465, a difference of 50.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,015 compared to $116,156, a difference of 39.9%), and median household income ($70,605 compared to $98,496, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $56,872, a difference of 8.7%), median earnings ($42,189 compared to $48,836, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($34,034 compared to $41,461, a difference of 21.8%).
Income Metric | Cajun | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,527 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,157 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,605 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,189 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,325 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,034 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,338 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,393 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,015 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,397 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 33.9% | Average 25.9% |
Cajun vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (30.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 89.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (22.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 87.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 42.5%), and single father poverty (23.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 49.8%).
Poverty Metric | Cajun | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 40.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Cajun vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 111.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.2%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Cajun | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cajun vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cajun | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.5% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Cajun vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 35.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.1%), family households (64.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Cajun | Chinese |
Family Households | Excellent 64.8% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.0% | Excellent 30.2% |
Cajun vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 48.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cajun | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.7% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Cajun vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and associate's degree (37.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Education Level Metric | Cajun | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Cajun vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (7.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 53.0%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.0%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.7%).
Disability Metric | Cajun | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |