Zimbabwean vs Aleut Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Aleut
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Aleuts

Exceptional
Fair
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Aleut Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,830,053 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.875. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.984% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 2,983.6 Aleuts.
Zimbabwean Integration in Aleut Communities

Zimbabwean vs Aleut Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $98,702, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $51,168, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,377, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,708, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,719, a difference of 5.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Aleut Income
Income MetricZimbabweanAleut
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Poor
$42,210
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Poor
$98,702
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Fair
$83,446
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$44,241
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$51,168
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Poor
$38,719
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$50,377
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Poor
$91,370
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Average
$100,052
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Excellent
$62,708
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
23.7%

Zimbabwean vs Aleut Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 33.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Aleut Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanAleut
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Poor
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Fair
16.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
15.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Poor
12.4%

Zimbabwean vs Aleut Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 52.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 52.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Aleut Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanAleut
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%

Zimbabwean vs Aleut Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Aleut Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanAleut
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
81.0%

Zimbabwean vs Aleut Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 37.1%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.70%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.96%).
Zimbabwean vs Aleut Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanAleut
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Poor
45.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
39.3%

Zimbabwean vs Aleut Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 44.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.40%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Aleut Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanAleut
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
13.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
87.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
6.9%

Zimbabwean vs Aleut Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.5%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.11%), 10th grade (94.9% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
Zimbabwean vs Aleut Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanAleut
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Average
85.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
55.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
39.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
31.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Zimbabwean vs Aleut Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 50.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.050%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Aleut Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanAleut
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
28.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
4.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%