Zimbabwean vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,821,352 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.821% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 2,820.6 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $39,558, a difference of 15.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $95,573, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $79,509, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,000, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,202, a difference of 6.8%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 64.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 52.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 70.5%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 69.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 58.4%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 33.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (47.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 92.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 57.8%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 52.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 9th grade (95.9% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 150.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 9.9%).