Zimbabwean vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,252,444 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 204.7 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $51,731, a difference of 12.9%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $62,516, a difference of 11.0%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $53,386, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $66,892, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $96,324, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.11%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.34%).