Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Laos
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,765,086 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.321% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 321.1 Immigrants from Laos.
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $37,857, a difference of 21.0%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $92,239, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $90,909, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $36,841, a difference of 10.7%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 45.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 34.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.6%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 82.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 65.1%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.9%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |