Zimbabwean vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,132,957 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.633% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 633.3 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $76,362, a difference of 39.9%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $66,974, a difference of 35.3%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $81,385, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,275, a difference of 13.2%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $35,673, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 131.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 86.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 83.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.2%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 151.3%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 105.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 96.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 44.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.47, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 57.8%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 47.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 57.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 44.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.8%).