Vietnamese vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Vietnamese
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Vietnamese
Chinese
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Vietnamese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,079,509 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Vietnamese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Vietnamese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Vietnamese corresponds to a decrease of 16.1 Chinese.
Vietnamese vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,143 compared to $77,465, a difference of 38.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,788 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.8%), and wage/income gap (21.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,377 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($56,127 compared to $58,162, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($46,172 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Vietnamese | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,368 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $96,123 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,248 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,172 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,525 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,377 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,127 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,089 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,788 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,143 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.0% | Average 25.9% |
Vietnamese vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 103.6%), family poverty (11.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 76.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.9%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 25.4%).
Poverty Metric | Vietnamese | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Vietnamese vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 52.1%), and female unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Vietnamese | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Vietnamese vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Vietnamese | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 29.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 70.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.8% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Vietnamese vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.1%), married-couple households (43.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and currently married (44.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.90%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Vietnamese | Chinese |
Family Households | Average 64.2% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.37 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Vietnamese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 219.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 128.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 91.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 91.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Vietnamese | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Vietnamese vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 115.6%), college, under 1 year (61.7% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and college, 1 year or more (57.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Vietnamese | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.0% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Vietnamese vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 54.1%), disability age under 5 (0.81% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and male disability (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Vietnamese | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.81% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |