Immigrants from Sweden vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,852,118 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 44.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $46,098, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $56,872, a difference of 15.0%), and median earnings ($54,478 compared to $48,836, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,318 compared to $116,156, a difference of 1.9%), median household income ($100,699 compared to $98,496, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($122,765 compared to $116,188, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family households (62.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 9.0%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (47.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.5%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.1%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.0%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.7%).