Immigrants from England vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from England
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from England

Chinese

Good
Exceptional
8,183
SOCIAL INDEX
79.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
83rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from England Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,570,597 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 151.6 Chinese.
Immigrants from England Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from England vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $77,465, a difference of 17.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.2%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.45%), median earnings ($49,722 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $104,264, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from England vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EnglandChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,844
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,038
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,098
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,722
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,527
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,277
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,817
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,020
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,446
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,715
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from England vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 27.3%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.2%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 15.3%).
Immigrants from England vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EnglandChinese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from England vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.6%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from England vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EnglandChinese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from England vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.78%).
Immigrants from England vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EnglandChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.1%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from England vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.4%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from England vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EnglandChinese
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.1%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from England vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from England vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EnglandChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.1%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.7%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from England vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Immigrants from England vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EnglandChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.6%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.4%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from England vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from England vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EnglandChinese
Disability
Poor
12.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Average
12.2%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%