Zimbabwean vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,787 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.402% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 2,401.7 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $85,647, a difference of 28.4%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $35,688, a difference of 28.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $52,832, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,279, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $34,421, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 83.5%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 67.0%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.35%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.7%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 31.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.3%), family households (64.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 75.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 72.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 5.3%).