Puerto Rican vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,572,113 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($42,550 compared to $77,465, a difference of 82.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,234 compared to $116,156, a difference of 67.8%), and median household income ($59,197 compared to $98,496, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $41,461, a difference of 31.4%), median earnings ($35,560 compared to $48,836, a difference of 37.3%), and wage/income gap (18.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 246.5%), family poverty (20.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 212.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (32.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 176.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 80.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 84.7%), and single father poverty (31.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 104.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (8.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 86.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 84.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (9.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 43.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (13.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 49.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 69.3%), births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 51.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 88.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 87.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 52.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.9%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 89.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (8.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 76.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.6%).