Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,355,988 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 24.7 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $82,193, a difference of 30.0%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $70,005, a difference of 29.4%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $85,356, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.5%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $47,832, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 45.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 43.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 26.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.38%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.5%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 54.6%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.2%).