Guatemalan vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guatemalans

Chinese

Poor
Exceptional
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Guatemalan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,178,289 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Chinese.
Guatemalan Integration in Chinese Communities

Guatemalan vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $77,465, a difference of 42.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $116,156, a difference of 32.4%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $116,188, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.9%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $41,461, a difference of 16.2%).
Guatemalan vs Chinese Income
Income MetricGuatemalanChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,766
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,295
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,961
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,205
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,736
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,695
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,525
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,331
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,705
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,526
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.6%
Average
25.9%

Guatemalan vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 93.0%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 80.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.0%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.1%).
Guatemalan vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricGuatemalanChinese
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.8%

Guatemalan vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 48.8%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.1%).
Guatemalan vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuatemalanChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Guatemalan vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Guatemalan vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuatemalanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Exceptional
84.1%

Guatemalan vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.3%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.40 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.7%).
Guatemalan vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuatemalanChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.3%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.40
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.1%
Excellent
30.2%

Guatemalan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.9%).
Guatemalan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuatemalanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.8%

Guatemalan vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 134.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and associate's degree (38.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Guatemalan vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricGuatemalanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.4%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.5%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.8%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.0%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Guatemalan vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.59%).
Guatemalan vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricGuatemalanChinese
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%