Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,058,847 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.658. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.305% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 304.8 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $77,465, a difference of 17.2%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $46,098, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $56,872, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $116,156, a difference of 1.6%), median family income ($118,053 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.6%), and median household income ($96,836 compared to $98,496, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.65%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (25.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 9.0%), family households (63.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.93%), currently married (48.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 56.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.8%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.6%).