South American vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,035,115 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,854 compared to $77,465, a difference of 29.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,837 compared to $116,156, a difference of 15.2%), and median family income ($101,856 compared to $116,188, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($46,804 compared to $48,836, a difference of 4.3%), and median male earnings ($54,492 compared to $56,872, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 54.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.7%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 44.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.1%), family households (66.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 58.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 35.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.0%), master's degree (15.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.86%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 37.5%), male disability (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.2%).