French vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
French
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
French
Chinese
5,755
SOCIAL INDEX
55.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
169th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in French Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,771,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Chinese.
French vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $77,465, a difference of 29.8%), median household income ($83,468 compared to $98,496, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.8%), median earnings ($46,296 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.5%), and per capita income ($43,685 compared to $46,098, a difference of 5.5%).
Income Metric | French | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,685 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,368 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,468 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,296 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,350 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,457 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,230 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,665 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,824 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,656 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Average 25.9% |
French vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 34.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and single father poverty (18.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 18.0%).
Poverty Metric | French | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.7% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
French vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 73.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | French | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Poor 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
French vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.70%).
Labor Participation Metric | French | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.1% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 84.1% |
French vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | French | Chinese |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.4% | Excellent 30.2% |
French vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 27.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.55%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | French | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
French vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (45.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 6.8%), college, 1 year or more (58.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (36.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | French | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 36.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
French vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | French | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 23.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |