Zimbabwean vs Liberian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Liberian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Liberians

Exceptional
Poor
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,824
SOCIAL INDEX
15.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
286th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Liberian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,967,190 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.162% in Liberians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 162.0 Liberians.
Zimbabwean Integration in Liberian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Liberian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $54,356, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $82,005, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $48,917, a difference of 4.8%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,215, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $43,536, a difference of 10.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Liberian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanLiberian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$38,780
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$91,722
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$75,667
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$43,536
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$49,318
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$38,215
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$48,917
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$82,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$88,929
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$54,356
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
21.4%

Zimbabwean vs Liberian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 56.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 38.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.85%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Liberian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanLiberian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
20.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.8%

Zimbabwean vs Liberian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.6%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Liberian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanLiberian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%

Zimbabwean vs Liberian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 0.73%).
Zimbabwean vs Liberian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanLiberian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
67.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Excellent
83.0%

Zimbabwean vs Liberian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 42.5%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Liberian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanLiberian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
40.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
8.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
37.4%

Zimbabwean vs Liberian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 19.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Liberian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanLiberian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
12.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.3%

Zimbabwean vs Liberian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.5%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%).
Zimbabwean vs Liberian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanLiberian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Poor
88.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
56.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
43.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Zimbabwean vs Liberian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.8%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.020%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Liberian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanLiberian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
25.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%