Serbian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,355,348 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Serbian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.737. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Serbians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Serbians corresponds to an increase of 64.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,551 compared to $36,475, a difference of 27.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,320 compared to $77,929, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,522 compared to $82,193, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,087 compared to $53,732, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,106 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.1%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 43.1%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and bachelor's degree (40.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.9%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.7%).