Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Thailand

Chickasaw

Fair
Fair
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,741,597 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 86.6 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,327 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,400 compared to $82,193, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $77,929, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $47,832, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $53,732, a difference of 12.1%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ThailandChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,289
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,840
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,327
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,598
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,908
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,810
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,645
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,337
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,400
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,217
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 25.8%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ThailandChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ThailandChickasaw
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ThailandChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ThailandChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.4%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.8%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ThailandChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 59.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (88.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.85%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ThailandChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.5%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.0%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.8%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ThailandChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%