Immigrants from Dominica vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominica
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Dominica
Chickasaw
427
SOCIAL INDEX
1.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
345th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Dominica Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,353,782 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Dominica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominica corresponds to an increase of 50.8 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Dominica vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 35.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,301 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($37,825 compared to $34,414, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,411 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.060%), median male earnings ($47,651 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.38%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,311 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Dominica | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,952 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,411 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,760 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,420 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,651 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,825 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,301 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,351 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,311 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,071 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Dominica vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 46.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and receiving food stamps (18.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.52%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Dominica | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Dominica vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Dominica | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Dominica vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Dominica | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Dominica vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.0%), married-couple households (39.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and currently married (40.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Dominica | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Poor 27.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.4% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Dominica vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 183.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 77.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (41.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 61.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Dominica | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 41.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Dominica vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 67.0%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Dominica | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Dominica vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 69.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 41.5%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Dominica | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |