Honduran vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Honduran
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hondurans

Chickasaw

Tragic
Fair
1,014
SOCIAL INDEX
7.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
327th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Honduran Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,652,552 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Honduran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.796. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hondurans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hondurans corresponds to an increase of 66.0 Chickasaw.
Honduran Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Honduran vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,885 compared to $44,763, a difference of 9.2%), and median household income ($72,588 compared to $70,005, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,638 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.080%), median family income ($85,004 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.41%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,540 compared to $77,929, a difference of 0.78%).
Honduran vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricHonduranChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,031
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,004
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,588
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,638
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,374
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,013
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,885
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,540
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,079
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,634
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
27.2%

Honduran vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 32.7%), and married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.65%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and single female poverty (25.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Honduran vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricHonduranChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
13.1%

Honduran vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Honduran vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHonduranChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.4%

Honduran vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Honduran vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHonduranChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.8%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
79.0%

Honduran vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.9%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and currently married (42.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.060%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Honduran vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHonduranChickasaw
Family Households
Average
64.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.5%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.7%
Tragic
36.3%

Honduran vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.8%).
Honduran vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHonduranChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Honduran vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 80.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and high school diploma (83.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.85%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Honduran vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricHonduranChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.4%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.0%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.3%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.1%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.6%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Honduran vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%).
Honduran vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricHonduranChickasaw
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Average
11.3%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.9%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%