Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Puget Sound Salish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Puget Sound Salish

Chickasaw

Average
Fair
5,672
SOCIAL INDEX
54.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
172nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Puget Sound Salish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,011,039 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 61.5 Chickasaw.
Puget Sound Salish Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $77,929, a difference of 20.2%), and median household income ($84,011 compared to $70,005, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $53,732, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($53,704 compared to $47,832, a difference of 12.3%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricPuget Sound SalishChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,495
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,958
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Fair
$84,011
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Average
$46,333
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,704
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,376
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,543
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,661
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,340
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,934
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
27.2%

Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 36.1%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.2%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricPuget Sound SalishChickasaw
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.1%

Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuget Sound SalishChickasaw
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%

Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuget Sound SalishChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.3%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.57%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuget Sound SalishChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.4%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
36.3%

Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.3%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.7%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuget Sound SalishChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.6%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricPuget Sound SalishChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.9%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.9%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.7%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricPuget Sound SalishChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.97%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.9%