Creek vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Chickasaw
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,821,000 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Chickasaw.
Creek vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $77,929, a difference of 4.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $82,193, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $53,732, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.13%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $44,763, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $40,672, a difference of 2.6%).
Income Metric | Creek | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.69%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Poverty Metric | Creek | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Creek vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.4% |
Creek vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Creek vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.8%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.35%), and family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Creek vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Creek vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.1%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Creek | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Creek vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.7%), ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.45%).
Disability Metric | Creek | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |