Soviet Union vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Soviet Union
Chickasaw
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Soviet Union Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,396,656 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to a decrease of 52.0 Chickasaw.
Soviet Union vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $36,475, a difference of 48.6%), median family income ($119,262 compared to $85,356, a difference of 39.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,457 compared to $77,929, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 12.2%), householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $53,732, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,340 compared to $44,763, a difference of 23.6%).
Income Metric | Soviet Union | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,202 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $119,262 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,098 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,290 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,382 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,556 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,340 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,457 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,008 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,848 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Soviet Union vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 48.6%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 42.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.4%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.8%).
Poverty Metric | Soviet Union | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Soviet Union vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Soviet Union | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
Soviet Union vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Soviet Union | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Soviet Union vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.3%), births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.90%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Soviet Union | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 60.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 24.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Soviet Union vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 121.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 68.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 11.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 56.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Soviet Union | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 82.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 45.7% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Soviet Union vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 95.3%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 79.7%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Soviet Union | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Soviet Union vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 84.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 74.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.9%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.2%).
Disability Metric | Soviet Union | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |