Japanese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,485,527 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,395 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $82,193, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $77,929, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.6%), householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $53,732, a difference of 7.8%), and per capita income ($39,870 compared to $36,475, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 30.1%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.2%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 97.5%), bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.61%), college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and ged/equivalency (82.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.6%).