Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Chickasaw

Exceptional
Fair
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,562,587 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $70,005, a difference of 51.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $82,193, a difference of 51.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $77,929, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $44,763, a difference of 29.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $53,732, a difference of 30.5%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,660
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,956
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$106,057
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$57,114
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$68,960
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,324
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,818
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$116,626
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$124,188
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,103
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.3%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 64.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 30.7%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.6%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.3%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 47.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.0%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.6%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 81.4%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 75.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Good
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
72.1%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 81.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 78.0%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.3%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.4%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%