Croatian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,705,122 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Croatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Croatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Croatians corresponds to an increase of 62.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,383 compared to $82,193, a difference of 31.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,414 compared to $77,929, a difference of 31.4%), and per capita income ($47,742 compared to $36,475, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,662 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,225 compared to $53,732, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 48.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 47.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.0%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.1%).