South African vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,817,669 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to a decrease of 16.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,044 compared to $36,475, a difference of 37.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,719 compared to $82,193, a difference of 33.5%), and median household income ($93,379 compared to $70,005, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $34,414, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 34.3%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.8%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.20%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.61%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 69.5%), master's degree (18.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 58.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 55.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.1%).