Guyanese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,451,119 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to a decrease of 17.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 48.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $44,763, a difference of 23.3%), and median female earnings ($40,973 compared to $34,414, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,351 compared to $53,732, a difference of 4.9%), median male earnings ($50,613 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.8%), and median family income ($93,373 compared to $85,356, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and receiving food stamps (16.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 48.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 39.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.8%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and currently married (41.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.19, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 272.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 113.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 30.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 66.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 93.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.2%), master's degree (13.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and bachelor's degree (34.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 95.9%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 71.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.2%).