Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chickasaw
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,596,205 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 61.8 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $36,475, a difference of 40.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $82,193, a difference of 39.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $77,929, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $44,763, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $53,732, a difference of 23.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,361 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,053 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,836 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,769 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,346 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,317 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,028 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,149 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,336 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,087 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 54.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 53.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 23.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.44%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.83%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.8%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 65.8%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.9%), and bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.3% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 68.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 14.1%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |