Czechoslovakian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Chickasaw
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,247,900 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.369% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 369.3 Chickasaw.
Czechoslovakian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $82,193, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $77,929, a difference of 22.0%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $70,005, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $53,732, a difference of 12.8%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 35.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.7%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.0%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.35%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.9%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.0%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |