Spanish American vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,555,695 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Spanish American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.543% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish Americans corresponds to an increase of 543.3 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.3%), median household income ($75,386 compared to $70,005, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,722 compared to $77,929, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,008 compared to $47,832, a difference of 2.5%), median earnings ($42,316 compared to $40,672, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,913 compared to $44,763, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.0%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.5%), births to unmarried women (38.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.25%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.4%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.9%).