Alaska Native vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Alaska Natives
Chickasaw
2,905
SOCIAL INDEX
26.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
239th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Alaska Native Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,826,519 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.738. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 99.5 Chickasaw.
Alaska Native vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $44,763, a difference of 20.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $82,193, a difference of 14.3%), and median household income ($79,509 compared to $70,005, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $47,832, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($43,750 compared to $40,672, a difference of 7.6%), and per capita income ($39,558 compared to $36,475, a difference of 8.5%).
Income Metric | Alaska Native | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,558 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,573 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $79,509 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,750 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,711 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,202 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,000 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,018 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,991 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,748 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Alaska Native vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Alaska Native | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Alaska Native vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 99.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 76.3%), and male unemployment (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Alaska Native | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 10.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.7% | Good 5.4% |
Alaska Native vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.86%).
Labor Participation Metric | Alaska Native | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Alaska Native vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.3%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Alaska Native | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.37 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Alaska Native vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 121.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Alaska Native | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Alaska Native vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.0%), college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Alaska Native | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 89.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Alaska Native vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 69.1%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.8%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (52.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Alaska Native | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |