Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from India
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from India

Chickasaw

Exceptional
Fair
10,255
SOCIAL INDEX
100/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
1st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from India Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,348,413 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from India communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from India within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from India corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from India Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($113,009 compared to $70,005, a difference of 61.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($132,488 compared to $82,193, a difference of 61.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($124,238 compared to $77,929, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (31.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 16.1%), householder income under 25 years ($59,914 compared to $44,763, a difference of 33.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,804 compared to $53,732, a difference of 35.5%).
Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from IndiaChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$55,268
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$134,028
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$113,009
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$60,648
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,207
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$48,292
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$59,914
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$124,238
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$132,488
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,804
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
31.5%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 89.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (10.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 82.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (10.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.9%), and single father poverty (14.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 35.1%).
Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from IndiaChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
23.8%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.8%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 46.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from IndiaChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
3.8%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from IndiaChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.3%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.0%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.4%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 58.6%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.1%), and divorced or separated (10.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.58%), family households (67.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from IndiaChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
67.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
31.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
52.7%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.21
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
51.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from IndiaChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (22.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 95.4%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 87.5%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 83.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from IndiaChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.7%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
74.4%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
69.6%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
58.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 94.4%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 88.8%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 77.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.3%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and self-care disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.5%).
Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from IndiaChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%