Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Chickasaw
1,533
SOCIAL INDEX
12.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
303rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Liberia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,247,739 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.444% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 444.3 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 32.2%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $34,414, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $44,763, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.44%), median male earnings ($48,317 compared to $47,832, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $77,929, a difference of 3.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,165 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,450 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,896 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,923 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,317 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,970 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,981 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,863 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,739 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,967 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 28.5%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.2% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 48.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.6%), married-couple households (40.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 55.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.3% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.9%), bachelor's degree (33.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and associate's degree (42.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and 11th grade (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.4% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |