Bahamian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,060,637 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 34.2%), median male earnings ($44,756 compared to $47,832, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $53,732, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,427 compared to $36,475, a difference of 0.13%), median household income ($69,726 compared to $70,005, a difference of 0.40%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,369 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.2%), poverty (15.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty (16.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.2%), married-couple households (40.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and currently married (41.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 31.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.22%), college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.2%).