Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Chickasaw
988
SOCIAL INDEX
7.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
329th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Dutch West Indian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,936,949 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.338% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 338.1 Chickasaw.
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,475 compared to $53,732, a difference of 6.5%), median family income ($81,852 compared to $85,356, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $82,193, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,260 compared to $77,929, a difference of 0.87%), median female earnings ($34,106 compared to $34,414, a difference of 0.90%), and median earnings ($40,107 compared to $40,672, a difference of 1.4%).
Income Metric | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,922 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $81,852 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,412 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,107 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,656 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,106 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,816 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,260 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $79,171 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,475 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (19.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.3% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.95%).
Labor Participation Metric | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.8%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Average 64.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Poor 27.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and hearing disability (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 0.66%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and female disability (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.9% |