Central American vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,432,850 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $44,763, a difference of 17.6%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and median household income ($78,803 compared to $70,005, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.55%), median earnings ($42,280 compared to $40,672, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $53,732, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.63%), female poverty (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and currently married (43.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (66.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 100.5%), high school diploma (82.5% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.8%).