Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,609,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 19.0%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.6%), and median household income ($77,631 compared to $70,005, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $53,732, a difference of 5.4%), median male earnings ($50,408 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $77,929, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 19.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and single female poverty (23.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.7%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 55.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.8%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.30%), ged/equivalency (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and high school diploma (87.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.0%).