Colville vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Colville
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Colville
Chickasaw
1,752
SOCIAL INDEX
15.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
289th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Colville Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,084,732 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Colville communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Colville corresponds to an increase of 64.7 Chickasaw.
Colville vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Colville and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 27.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,774 compared to $44,763, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($37,514 compared to $34,414, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,094 compared to $70,005, a difference of 0.13%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,474 compared to $82,193, a difference of 0.34%), and median family income ($85,792 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.51%).
Income Metric | Colville | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,047 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,792 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,094 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,151 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,516 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,514 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,774 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,604 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,474 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,739 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Colville vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Colville and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and single female poverty (29.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.7%).
Poverty Metric | Colville | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 29.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 39.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Colville vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Colville and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 78.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Colville | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.4% | Good 5.4% |
Colville vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Colville and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (59.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
Labor Participation Metric | Colville | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Colville vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Colville and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.9%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Colville | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 45.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Colville vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Colville and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 74.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Colville | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 25.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Colville vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Colville and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.1%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Colville | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Colville vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Colville and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 88.7%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.82%), female disability (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Colville | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.9% |