Brazilian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,160,710 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $36,475, a difference of 28.0%), median household income ($88,934 compared to $70,005, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $53,732, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $34,414, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 38.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.5%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.14%), currently married (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.3%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.4%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.5%).