Israeli vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,734,325 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.660% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to an increase of 659.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,596 compared to $36,475, a difference of 44.2%), median family income ($118,577 compared to $85,356, a difference of 38.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,186 compared to $82,193, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $44,763, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $53,732, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 32.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 31.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.6%), births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 106.3%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 80.2%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 65.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 61.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.8%).