Mongolian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Mongolian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Mongolians
Chickasaw
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Mongolian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,933,756 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.746. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.295% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 294.7 Chickasaw.
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $82,193, a difference of 35.8%), per capita income ($49,173 compared to $36,475, a difference of 34.8%), and median household income ($93,971 compared to $70,005, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $44,763, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $53,732, a difference of 21.6%).
Income Metric | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,173 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,553 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,971 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,038 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,350 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,542 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,540 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,578 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,602 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,326 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.5%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 34.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.3%).
Poverty Metric | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%).
Unemployment Metric | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.4% |
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.1%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 30.0%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.33%), currently married (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.86%).
Family Structure Metric | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 67.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.8%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 82.5%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.11%), 9th grade (95.0% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 93.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 89.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.3%).
Disability Metric | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |